Talk:Project Z (bomber project)

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 06:51, November 5, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Sources

I am finding more sites for use as sources. Can someone add them in?

96.243.206.236 (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first link is to a copy of Wikipedia; look at the bottom: "This article is from Wikipedia licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License." The second is from a source that cannot be called reliable--it has no author, no publication information, no secondary or tertiary sources. Please see WP:RS. You should look for this kind of information in books, probably, not just on the internets. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The word wikipedia is not on the page of the first link. Look at it again - "2 References

Ogawa, Toshihiko (1993). Nihon Kokuki Daizukan, 1910-1945, Tokyo: Kokushokankoka"

Straight from it

We already link this site for the second link. The link i gave is a more specific page.

96.243.206.236 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not entirely sure what you are saying here. The word Wikipedia is on that page, at the bottom, and I cited it above. If you care to actually look, you'll see that it even links directly to the Nakajima G10N's edit page, here. Drmies (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see what it is now, I had NoScript on. Also, the second link - The article links to that site already, but that link I posted goes to a more topic-specific page. Make sense?

96.243.206.236 (talk) 22:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, it is not a reliable source. The reference I added I found through Google Books, not on the internet, which is full of unreliable personal sites. Drmies (talk) 05:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We already link to that same site! Also, if you added a reference, should the "this page is unreferenced" be removed since the page DOES have a reference?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.206.236 (talk • contribs)

The page does not give author's name nor bibliograhy and/or sources used for the article. External links rules are bit relaxed, but strictly speaking this page probably does not qualify as external link either.

I'm not sure if one reference is enough to replace {unreferenced} template with {refimprove}.--ja_62 (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen pages with only one reference and no "unreferenced" tag.

96.243.206.159 (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]